Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
。Line官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
图②：在山西临汾市襄汾县西贾乡三盛村，果农对苹果园进行疏花作业。
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
30-day money-back guarantee。快连下载安装对此有专业解读
Tomlinson will be spinning jokes about everything from the Bible and her own bisexuality to Pete Davidson. — K.P.