Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Last Hours: Save up to $680 on your pass before 11:59 p.m. tonight.
2026-02-27 09:00:00，这一点在快连下载安装中也有详细论述
圖像加註文字，香港會展中心一場寵物展覽上，一位女士與三隻寵物犬在模擬茶餐廳「卡位」餐桌上拍照。新政策若得到落實，寵物犬將可隨飼主進入獲得拍照加註的餐廳，但不准上桌。香港餐廳「禁狗令」：30年後拆牆嘗試
，这一点在91视频中也有详细论述
参考资料：[1]内存价格暴走，高盛下调全球手机销量预期，中低端先扛不住，华尔街见闻
Tony Jolliffe BBC，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026